|
1
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
4
|
- Scoping Study
- - Three public meetings were held
- - An environmental overview and
- alternative alignments were
produced
|
|
5
|
- Scoping Study
- Phase 1 environmental and PE
- Phase 2 design
- ROW/Utilities
- Construction
|
|
6
|
- Current Phase
- - All efforts have been concentrated on the Section 106 Review of
Historic Properties
- - All properties considered to be eligible for the
National Historic Register have been documented
and property boundaries mapped
- - Cultural Historic Resources Report being drafted
for formal submittal to review agencies
|
|
7
|
- To serve as representatives of the community
at large
- To assist the project team in the selection of evaluation criteria
- To derive “weights of importance” for the evaluation criteria
- To assist in the development of a final preferred alignment
- To aid the project team in dispersing material
to the community
|
|
8
|
- A newsletter with an application enclosed was sent to residents within
the proposed corridor.
- Each resident within the corridor had the opportunity to apply for the
committee.
- A second letter was sent to residents of specific subdivisions to seek
membership
- Goal was to have a cross section of interests represented on the CAG
|
|
9
|
|
|
10
|
- Roles and Responsibilities (See Handout)
- Serve as representatives of the community
- Help develop evaluation criteria
- Assist in evaluating alignments based
on criteria
- Assist in presenting information at the
public meeting
|
|
11
|
- Ground Rules (See Handout)
- Everyone is encouraged to express their opinions
free of ridicule from others.
- We will provide direct and open feedback in
a timely manner.
- We will attend all meetings.
- We will start meetings on time and try to end meetings within the
scheduled time.
- We will keep our focus on the task at hand and
avoid sidetracking, personality conflicts and
hidden agendas.
|
|
12
|
|
|
13
|
- Split into four committees
- Identify 5-8 issues/concerns for each committee
- Provide summary of issues/concerns from scoping study
- Summarize Committee issues/concerns
- Review survey form
- Discuss mailing list
- Discuss weighting criteria methodology
|
|
14
|
- Mail survey form to mailing list asking
for new issues/concerns
- Compile data
|
|
15
|
|
|
16
|
- 1st CAG Meeting
- Review project history
- Discuss CAG role and responsibilities
- Develop master list of issues and concerns
- Issues/concerns must be “quantifiable”
- Between 1st and 2nd CAG Meetings
- Mail out list of criteria to public on
survey form
- Combine public response into one master list
for next meeting
|
|
17
|
|
|
18
|
- 2nd CAG Meeting
- - Break into subcommittees
- - Review public comments and refine list of issues
- Between the 2nd and 3rd CAG Meetings
- Mail out new survey form asking for public
to list their top three issues from the list
- Compile weighted list for review by CAG
- Rough in new preliminary alignments
- Evaluate old and new alignments based on weighted criteria
|
|
19
|
|
|
20
|
- 3rd CAG Meeting
- Review final list of weighted criteria
- Review and comment on alignments
- Finalize date, time, and location of public meeting
- Between 3rd and 4th CAG Meeting
- Day after 3rd meeting, advertise for the public meeting in
all local news media
- Prepare handouts and displays for public meeting
|
|
21
|
- 4th CAG Meeting
- Review all materials to be presented at the public meeting
- Discuss format of the meeting and CAG role
- - Make any last minute
refinements to the alignments
- Between the 4th CAG and the Public Meeting
- Advertise public meeting a second time in the local newspapers
- Send out Newsletter advertising the public meeting and showing the
alignments and criteria
|
|
22
|
|
|
23
|
- Public Meeting
- Solicit comments on the alignments and
weighting criteria
- After Public Meeting
- Refine alignments based on public comment
- Send out summary of public comments and
show the preferred alignment
- Begin environmental baseline studies
|
|
24
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
26
|
- Set time and date for next meeting
(March 10th – 14th)
|
|
27
|
|
|
28
|
- Gary Valentine, P.E.
- District Pre-Construction Engineer
- Kentucky Department of Highways District 4
- 634 East Dixie
- P.O. Box 309
- Elizabethtown, Kentucky 47202-0309
- Phone: 270-766-5066
- Fax: 270-766-5069
- E-mail: gary.valentine@mail.state.ky.us
|
|
29
|
- Jeff Schaefer
- District Environmental Coordinator
- Kentucky Department of Highways District 4
- 634 East Dixie
- P.O. Box 309
- Elizabethtown, Kentucky 47202-0309
- Phone: 270-766-5066
- Fax: 270-766-5069
- E-mail: jeff.schaefer@mail.state.ky.us
|
|
30
|
- Richard Sutherland, P.E.
- US 31E Project Manager
- American Consulting Engineers, PLC
- 400 E. Vine Street, Suite 100
- Lexington, Kentucky 40507
- Phone: 859-233-2100
- Fax: 850-254-9664
- E-mail: Sutherland@ace-plc.com
|
|
31
|
|